Less fouling, barrel wear, powder and pressure compared to the 17 Rem. The .17 Remington Fireball introduced a few years ago is a somewhat larger edition of the .17 Hornet, but the Fireball is less than trendy. I just need to save up. It is laser beam flat shooting. The Hornet ammo—available from Hornady and Federal—runs between $0.70 and $0.90 per round, while the .17 Remington ammo—available from Remington and Nosler—costs about $1.70 per round. 22 Hornets have been around forever, and maybe the brass is more available? This one is the BDL version chambered for 17 Remington centerfire. While the 17 Fireball is about 300 fps slower with all bullet weights than the 17 Remington, it is probably more popular today because it burns about 20 percent less powder with each squeeze of the trigger. Hornet, 17 Ackley Hornet, 17 Mach IV, 17 Fireball, 17 Remington, 17 Tactical and 17 PPC! I still don't know. Unsurprisingly it carries a lot more energy to the tune of 521 ft/lbs which is near double the Fireball and the 17 Rem at this distance. Loaded ammo as well as 17 Fireball brass has sold extremely well and is in short supply. P.O. Maybe it is just me but I knew several people who bought .17 Rem when they came out and sold them all pretty fast becuase of leading and loading issues. I’m betting the .17 Hornet will hang in there, however, because it has a ready-made home as any gun chambered for the .22 Hornet can also be chambered for the .17. Owning a .17-caliber rifle comes with its own set of challenges (a specialty cleaning rod must be ordered, and it’s very easy to wedge a patch in the bore), but among the centerfire choices, including the .17 Fireball, I like the .17 Hornet. I think the FB is off the list for now. 17 Remington Fireball. Trying to decide on a barrel in 17 cal to put on a Savage action. What one will do so will the other with the edge going to the 204. Aptly named the 17 Remington Fireball, it is their version of our most popular 17 caliber wildcat with minor changes from the original design in some areas. When carefully prepared handloads are fired in good barrels, accuracy of the two cartridges is the same. As far as I know, Remington is the only major arms manufacturer currently producing .17 Remington and .17 Fireball rifles. Mag. I've never been that interested in a centerfire 17, but I have a .204 Ruger that I shoot a lot. The .17 Hornet, also known as the .17 Ackley Hornet, is a .17 caliber centerfire rifle wildcat cartridge originally made by P.O. The muzzle velocities generated by the .17 Hornet run considerably slower than the .17 Remington—3650 fps for the 20-grain load, and 3870 fps for the lighter 15.5-grain NTX load from Hornady—yet the pressures, barrel wear and fouling are also less than those associated with the larger-cased .17 Remington. (805) 639-9222 elliots2007@gmail.com. Let’s take a look at the .17 Remington and the .17 Hornet and compare and contrast their attributes. 17 rem vs.17 fireball hey guys, I need help fast, i have two guns on hold at my local gun shop! I am really thinking CZ Varmint in 204 with the hope that CZ make a rifle in 17 Hornet in the future. And should you want to you can load the .17 Rem up to its full potential and leave the .17 FB in the dust. Between the two, I find the .17 Hornet to be the more efficient, affordable and sensible choice. Looks as if I am leaning to the 17 Remington at the moment. The .17 Remington is based on the .223 Remington or the .222 Remington Magnum, depending on which account you read, though looking at the design, the .222 Remington Magnum makes more sense to me. The cartridge was created by simply necking-down the .22 Hornet to .17 caliber. I can't comment on the Hornet or FB but have had a .17Rem since the late 70's/early 80's, the thing is a little gem of a rifle to shoot and very accurate. I like the 17 Hornet but do not really call it my coyote gun but would use it if under 100 yds. Mag. Mag.• .30-06 Springfield vs. .270 Winchester• 6.5 Creedmoor vs. 7mm-08 Remington• 8x57 Mauser vs. .318 Westley Richards• .358 Winchester vs. .350 Remington Magnum• .22-250 Remington vs. .220 Swift• .270 Winchester vs. .270 WSM• .26 Nosler vs. 6.5-300 Weatherby Magnum• .458 Win. So Remington now has a newer cartridge out, the 17 Fireball, which is just like the older 17 Mach IV wildcat. The Remington model 700 is one of the iconic American bolt action rifles. vs. .300 WSM• .223 Remington vs. .22-250 Remington, E-mail your comments/questions about this site to: EmediaHunter@nrahq.org, For questions/comments about American Hunter magazine, please e-mail:Publications@nrahq.org, You can contact the NRA via phone at: NRA Member Programs1-800-672-3888, To advertise on American Hunter, visit nramediakit.com for more information. Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 7 guests, Nosler Inc  |  Privacy  Use  Order Processing. It seems like a lot of work, so how about the 17 Remington from 223 brass using both commercial or military brass. Video That May Interest You On the other end of the stick, almost all firearm manufacturers offer rimfire rifles chambered in .17 HMR, so shooters can pick and choose. Find your best price for 17 Rem Fireball Ammo | Bulk 17 Rem Fireball Ammunition - AmmoSeek.com Search Engine 2021 The 17 Fireball didn't really set the shooting world on fire, nor did the 17 Rem. What are you thinking for use WT? The Fireball fired the 25 grain bullet out at 3,850 ft/sec. I see no point in getting a K Hornet or Hornet … I like the Hornet a lot but for practical handling and varmit blasting, the .204 s hard to beat with its .222 Mag case and .204 bore which is much easier to clean and manage than the .177. That is pretty flat! I have access to a Mach IV reamer, and I was thinking of building one, but now that there is a factory version out, I need to know if the two cartridges are identical. Sharing the rimmed design of the parent case, the .17 Hornet feeds nicely in a bolt-action repeating rifle—I spent some time with a Savage Model 25 Walking Varminter which shot very well—and will handle both varmints and predators to the same 300 to 350 yards that the .17 Remington will. I would also go 17/223 for the chambering but it is a custom. My .204 shoots 1/2 inch groups at 100 yards and is easy to load high quality loads at 4000 fps with 32 grain bullets. Velocity is close to the .17 Remington but with significantly less powder, and therefore less heat and fouling. I got a friend that is a coyote hunting machine and he swears by the 204. Many .17 Remington shooters have reported optimum accuracy when the bore is cleaned after every 10 - 20 shots, though more modern metallurgy used in both barrels and bullets has largely mitigated the fouling issue. I have thought about the same thing. The .17 Hornet, son of the classic .22 Hornet that our grandfathers delighted in shooting, is a well-balanced design. one is a 17 remington, the other is a 17 fireball. The 20-grain bullet can be pushed to over 4200 fps, and the 25-grain bullet breaks the 4000 fps mark, as well. Same C.O.L. The 17 Remington Fireball, based on the classic .221 Remington Fireball case, is an extremely well balanced cartridge that provides laser-flat trajectory, with match grade accuracy, all in a compact package that does not require excessive maintenance and won’t burn out barrels. If you get or have a 17 Hornet get the LEE Collect Neck Die. Privacy Policy   •   Contact Us   •   Warnings   •   FAQs   •  © 2021 National Rifle Association of America, Remington Model 700 American Hunter Rifle Project, Women On Target® Instructional Shooting Clinics, Volunteer At The Great American Outdoor Show, Marion P. Hammer Women Of Distinction Award, Women's Wildlife Management / Conservation Scholarship, National Youth Shooting Sports Ambassadors, NRA Outstanding Achievement Youth Award Presented by Brownells, National Youth Shooting Sports Cooperative Program, .450 Nitro Express vs. .470 Nitro Express, .358 Winchester vs. .350 Remington Magnum, .25-06 Remington vs. .257 Weatherby Magnum, Why Every Hunter Should Own a Rifle in a Common Caliber, Handgun Hunting: Top 5 Big-Game Cartridges, Head to Head: .22-250 Remington vs. .204 Ruger, 2021 National Rifle Association of America. vs. .300 Win. Get the American Hunter Insider newsletter for at-a-glance access to industry news, gear, gun reviews, videos and more—delivered directly to your Inbox. The introduction of the .17 HMR in 2002 rekindled the flame which was started by the .17 Remington in 1971. The 25 Gr grain bullet from the Hornet listed at 3,283 ft/sec. Ha. If they don't come out with a 17 Hornet then I will have to figure something out. Put it this way your 204 overlaps with the 17 remington. But, within 350 yards or so, the .17 Remington makes a great varmint and predator cartridge, as the frangible bullets make very small holes in a furbearer’s pelt—and usually don’t exit—yet have enough energy and a flat enough trajectory to place shots accurately on woodchucks and prairie dogs, creating that famous red mist. With a 23-degree shoulder and a case length of 1.796 inches—the .223 Remington uses a 1.760-inch-long case—the .17 Remington often has a powder charge heavier than its bullet. Kudos to Hornady for recognizing the potential of the design, and for bringing it to the masses. ... #3091226 - 09/14/17 09:13 AM Re: Choosing between 17 Fireball, 221 Fireball and 22 Hornet [Re: greengt88] … Until I place the order my mind will never settle on one. I would go 17 Fireball if I were you. I think some cases have been reloaded five times with no change on Over all Case Length. If I can't reload for it I would loose a lot of fun time spend in my own little world. The brass holds up much better than old 22 Hornet brass also. Re: .17 HMR Vs. .17 Rem Fireball?? Ackley in the early 1950s. Famed gunsmith and cartridge developer P.O. I enjoy reloading and as of now shoot my 17HMR about 10 times a year due to ammo prices and the fact that it is not that accurate. Trajectory comparable to a traditional 55 gr 223 Rem, but the felt recoil of a 22 WMR. by Philip Massaro - I just picked up a summer job so I may be able to swing it in a few months. Sotty, I am more of a smaller version, old and blind, knuckle dragger, but one none the less. The result was a small case … New for 2007, Remington's .17 Fireball was created by necking-down the .221 Fireball case (itself based on a shortened .222 Remington case) to accept .172" diameter bullets. The .17 Remington Fireball was created in 2007 by Remington Arms Company as a response to the popular wildcat round, the .17 Mach IV.Factory loads drive a 20 grain (1.3 g) bullet around 4,000 ft/s (1,219 m/s). I have the .17 Hornet and a .223. Home; Blog & Projects; Contact Us; Manufacturers; Showcase; Select Page Ballistics Results .17 Hornet (20-gr. I’ve used it for foxes and coyotes here in the northeast, and it’s proven itself on a hot prairie dog town. I think the FB is off the list for now. as the 22 Hornet (uses the existing action). I have used the 17 HM2, 17 HMR, 17 Fireball, 17 Rem, 204 Ruger , 22 Hornet, 221 Fireball, 222 Rem. I am not sure. If all three were in front of me right now and I could pick one it would take me a year to figure it out. The majority of .17-caliber loads are centered around 20- and 25-grain bullets (there are component bullets as heavy as 30 grains), and the centerfire .17 cases attain some serious velocity. 223 Rem, and other cartridge rifle for shooting prairie dogs. Friday, December 20, 2019. It takes 24 plus gr of powder to do this though. The small bore fouls easily, and you can see accuracy degrade in as little as ten shots in certain rifles, but they are a death ray on varmints and predators. We were picking off. Mag.• .404 Jeffery vs. .416 Rigby• .243 Winchester vs. 6mm Creedmoor• .300 PRC vs. .300 Win. I have the savage 17 hornet and I love it, Shot it yesterday for the first time. I use this collect die for my 22 hornet and have yet to retrim a single case. Yep, like Strut mentioned, the centerfire .17 cartridges are a different class than the rimfire versions. i called remington technicians the other day and they said the 17 If you’re getting into the sensational seventeens or been shooting them for years, this manual could help the beginner or even the experienced reloader. When developing its version of the .17 Hornet, Hornady shortened the .22 Hornet case about 0.050 inch to make overall cartridge length compatible with the magazines of existing rifles in .22 Hornet. My brain says go 204 then 17 Hornet next year then I think just get a 17 Rem and forget about the 204 and Hornet. No matter how you launch one of the 20 or 25-grain bullets, their weight and ballistic coefficient are so low that it makes the effects of wind deflection a definite consideration. What one of the 3 center fires would you get or would you go with a 204? I really like that little 17 Fireball, but then again, they could all be pretty awesome. I shoot .17 Fireballs in both T/C Encore and Remington 700 platforms. I still don't know. Extremely accurate. The case looks perfect once it is necked down and hardly changes at all after firing for the first time. The 17 Mach IV as its been known for decades which is the new .17 Fireball is very close to the .17 Rem with the lighter bullets that weigh up to 25 grains. The Bill Eichelberger line of cartridges uses .10-inch, .12-inch and .14-inch diameter bullets, though they are about as rare as hen’s teeth. The new .17 Fireball boasts an advertised muzzle velocity (MV) of 4000 fps and a 300 yard … The .204 caliber bullets are about the smallest that I can handle easily and get in the case straight. Then you could use 223 brass (17 Practical as it were...I have one BTW) Plus the Hornet brass is very fragile for loading. which one is the better cartridge? Since getting the 221 Fireball the old 22 Hornet stays at home. The 17 Hornet is too limiting IMHO. The 204 is about as good as it gets for an "in between" varmint cartridge … If all three were in front of me right now and I could pick one it would take me a year to figure it out. The slight five-degree shoulder of the .22 Hornet was radically steepened to a 25-degree shoulder and blown-out to increase case capacity. Debuted in 2007, it sends 20-grain bullets over 4,000 fps, and is also available in 25-grain loadings. It’s the finest all inclusive 17 manual vs. .458 Lott• 7mm Rem. We've got you covered.• 7mm RUM vs. .300 RUM• .308 Winchester vs. 7mm-08 Remington• 6.5 Creedmoor vs. .260 Remington• .303 British vs. 8x57 Mauser• .30-06 Springfield vs. All Other .30s• .17 HMR vs. .17 WSM• .450 Nitro Express vs. .470 Nitro Express• 350 Legend vs. .35 Remington• .280 Ackley Improved vs. 7mm Rem. Both are important issues to high-volume shooters such as varmint hunters At these velocities, the bullets are subjected to all sorts of stresses upon impact, and I’ve seen some over-zealous handloads strip the jacket from the core of the bullets. You will find the smallest commercial cartridges available are the .17-inch bores, and while they’ve been around exactly as long as I have, the shooting public seems to have an on-again-off-again relationship with the .17s. There are smaller bore diameters, but you’ll have to look long and hard to find them. Pretty cool write up on the 17 Winchester Super Magnum... Good read but I want center fire.